On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> > (Also, I wonder why people always fiddle with the cumbersome 192.168 > instead > of going for simply 10.) > > While it shouldn't matter, I've seen some serious networking brain damage if your router or the border router happen to be both trying to handle the same subnet, even in "nonroutable" space. If your upstream provider is using 10/8 space, then using 192.168/16 sidesteps that potential for conflict completely.
