-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 18 October 2015 19:55:58 Brian wrote: > > On Sun 18 Oct 2015 at 17:44:55 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
[...] > tomas said: > Yes, you are right about the CoC part. Still, if someone is picky about *not* > being cc'ed, I'd consider it polite to at least do his/her part and express > this wish with the headers in use for this purpose. At least *before* scolding > others <:*) > > Well, I am picky about not being cc'ed. I have tried to be polite. I have > asked tomas, who thinks I should do something in my headers, how to do it. > He tells me I can't. So now I feel free to "scold others". Well, be fair :-) I said you can in most of the cases. > The CoC says not to send cc's unless specifically requested. It is not a lot > to ask that people should follow the CoC. And I shall start following the > CoC and complaining, off list, every time, to everyone who cc's me. Perhaps > then they will stop this pain of a practice. > > It is perfectly reasonable that people should be asked to do one of three > things: > 1) subscribe > or > 2) read the archives > or > 3) request a copy. Don't take me wrong. I think its reasonable. But I think also we should try to be gentle about it (and try to "fix" as much as possible on our sides). That's all. Regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYj8U0ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaY+QCfbQKkq5Id5FpKRTrqtEmHfDTq yoYAnAhMGs4Z+UiAfsz9sK4X2N1Ls2Zr =rY1A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
