Granted, I am not sure what sites you wish to visit.
still, because lynx in its updated form mirrors the functions of some
mobile platforms, you might be amazed how well sites display with it.
especially the m. editions. Web designers are understanding that there
are still some people who are not interesting in loading tons of stuff, that
there are lots of people using very small screens etc.
be sure you are trying the latest edition before you pass on Lynx.
Karen
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
Last time I checked, most sites don't display properly with lynx because they
are not designed for text-based browses. All on the contrary, most web sites
are full of useless images, but nonetheless, not displaying them breaks those
sites.
There may be application for those browsers (like reading HTML manuals that
have minimal formatting), but obviously they are not suitable for ordinary
browsing.
El 11/10/15 a las 13:13, moxalt escribió:
Seriously, though, as much as you dread returning to lynx, it is the most
bandwith-friendly option on the table. If you don't want videos of any
kind,
and are content with just plaintext (and separately downloadable images)
you
should be safe. What's so bad about lynx?
