Last time I checked, most sites don't display properly with lynx because
they are not designed for text-based browses. All on the contrary, most
web sites are full of useless images, but nonetheless, not displaying
them breaks those sites.
There may be application for those browsers (like reading HTML manuals
that have minimal formatting), but obviously they are not suitable for
ordinary browsing.
El 11/10/15 a las 13:13, moxalt escribió:
Seriously, though, as much as you dread returning to lynx, it is the most
bandwith-friendly option on the table. If you don't want videos of any kind,
and are content with just plaintext (and separately downloadable images) you
should be safe. What's so bad about lynx?
