On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Chris Bannister wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:45:03PM +0200, Anders Wegge Keller wrote: > >> It seems that there's a lot of controversy about the SysV-replacement that > >>should not be named. Most, if not all of the arguments for, as well as > >>against seem to be of a philosophical, rather than stringent technichnical > >>nature. As such, they are probably not suited for this list. So my question > >>as a relative newcomer to the Debian ecosystem is if there is an -advocacy > >>list, where the philosophical differences can be beaten into the ground, > >>while keeping this list at a more factual level? > >> > >> If not, where do I propose the creation of such a list? > >There already is one, but unfortunately no one is using it. :( > >http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic > > > > So why, exactly, is the design philosophy and architecture of the Debian > ecosystem not a legitimate topic for discussion among Debian users?
The description of the debian-user list seems to be a misnomer. Perhaps it should read "Frontline support for users of the Debian Operating System."? -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141014061716.GE19221@tal
