On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:57 AM, PETER ZOELLER <peter_zoel...@rogers.com> wrote: > This is really ticking me off. We are becoming just like Microsoft that one > size fits all. Linux has always been about choice and modularity and > reconfigurability where a user or admin can choose that what suits him/her > and the type of system they want. You want sysvinit you use Debian or > Slackware, want Upstart go to Ubuntu, want systemd go to Fedora/Redhat. > Where in all this is my choice to have my system boot via the means I or any > user or admin considers to be the appropriate method to boot their system? > What's wrong with you people? Have you lost sight of why Linus designed > this system? Its about simplicity, modularity and reconfigurability. This > approach with systemd flies in the face of all this. Its like demanding > that you can use only ext4 as your file system. > >
The point of this thread was to demonstrate that you *do* still have a choice. It's relatively simple to remove systemd from your Debian installation if you choose to. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAFXvjvBiCvf9aOvXuwEOoHtOoi6VtjHmWjmOXa9iNF=4twy...@mail.gmail.com
