On Wed 27 Aug 2014 at 17:13:26 +0200, Bzzzz wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:19:02 +0100 > Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > However, it is considerably better at detecting errors than sysvinit. > > This isn't the thing that repels me; a better detection of potential > problems is of course a good thing.
That's all I wanted to establish. What you initially viewed as a problem turned out to have a happy ending and your system is now heathier, Also, we have all learned something about the thought put into the design of systemd. > But it is the other aspects of systemd where I join Paul Venezia about > the philosophy behind O-S softwares and behind *nices. Please join him on the site where his article is published; there is a comments section. Perhaps other like-minded people would like to accompany you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/27082014185826.566f71941...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
