Simon Tod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After a hdd install from knoppix 3.2 I tried to dist-upgrade to > Debian unstable. It all seems to work fine but my debian_version is > still reported as testing/unstable.
Isn't that what it's supposed to be? That's certainly what it is on this sid machine. > I've tracked this down to the fact that a number of packages from > the hdd install are not at the latest versions available in unstable > but are unoffical versions with different dependencies. The most > significant being sysvinit. > > If I try 'apt-get install sysvinit', I'm told I have the latest > version installed. Not true. The knoppix version is 2.84 something > or other, whereas 2.85 is available in unstable. Knowing what exactly the version is might be helpful. If the Knoppix people have added an epoch to their version number, APT would be entirely correct in concluding that 1:2.84-mumble is newer than 2.85-7. You might also check that your APT sources.list is correct, and that you haven't set up funny APT pinning rules. ObAreYouSureYouWantToRunUnstable: booting the laptop was, um, fun this morning, because I didn't have an /sbin/modprobe. Funky interactions between modutils and module-init-tools I haven't finished tracking down yet. Nothing in the BTS looks obvious, though. -- David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
