On Wed 05 Feb 2014 at 18:29:01 +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote: > > Network Manager isn't good, it's bad, however if you like it, you can > > use it with Xfce too and don't worry about installing GNOME > > dependencies, since Xfce is based on much GNOME stuff. Regarding to > > Thunar vs Nautlius, note that if you install all that automatic crap, > > than Thunar anyway will use GNOME Virtual File System. Xfce is based on > > GTK too. IOW you could use Natilus with Xfce and don't need to worry > > about too much extra dependencies, but you still could benefit from the > > advantages that Xfce has got over GNOME. > > Thats why I have been thinking that why not use a minimal window > manager like awesome or i3?
Network Manager isn't that bad that thousands of people don't use it successfully. Having spurned Xfce because it lacks a tabbed file browswer and a good network manager-type manager your thoughts appear fanciful. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/05022014140211.4a131bda7...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
