> Network Manager isn't good, it's bad, however if you like it, you can > use it with Xfce too and don't worry about installing GNOME > dependencies, since Xfce is based on much GNOME stuff. Regarding to > Thunar vs Nautlius, note that if you install all that automatic crap, > than Thunar anyway will use GNOME Virtual File System. Xfce is based on > GTK too. IOW you could use Natilus with Xfce and don't need to worry > about too much extra dependencies, but you still could benefit from the > advantages that Xfce has got over GNOME.
Thats why I have been thinking that why not use a minimal window manager like awesome or i3? -- Regards, Anubhav Yadav Imperial College of Engineering and Research, Pune. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CA+Jf9AE=c5BNmteb+zuRz=ag7scypx+9d9pf-xho1rg1rba...@mail.gmail.com
