> There are easier to understand and more tolerant licenses than those usually > used for Linux.
More tolerance does not means better. If GPL is demanding it's because it is a clever hack meant to prevent anybody from taking something free (as in freedom, but also free of charge as a consequence of freedom of sharing the code) and turning it into something that is not. You can agree with it or not, but FSF supplies a list of licenses compatible with GPL. Said that, your advice to be careful with licenses is very wise. > It's like using Emacs, very complicated. Emacs predates the CUA standard, very different, therefore very strange, very much richer but not complicated. Commands are usually bound to keys on a mnemonic basis (problem: mnemonic but in English only), with many command operating on character, word or paragraph according to the use of Control, Meta (aka Alt) or both. Furthermore commands that ar e used more get a shorter invocation. I can tell more if requested, that is enoughrt for this OT. -- Gian Uberto Lauri Messaggio inviato da un tablet
