On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Steffen Dettmer <steffen.dett...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom H <tomh0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> allow-auto eth0.9 >>> iface eth0.9 inet static >>> address 192.168.1.119 >>> netmask 255.255.255.0 >>> gateway 192.168.1.1 >>> post-up ip address add 192.168.1.199/24 dev eth0.9 >>> >>> Is the example above correct? Does it work for you? Could your >>> machine be boot so quickly that it might not be visible without >>> adding --noclear to /etc/inittab for tty1 getty? >> >> I tested once. I just took down the network so that only "lo" was >> defined and then brought it up with what I'd posted. > > I retested after "dpkg -P vlan", booted a couple of times and got > no single error. Seems this mean to use VLAN someone should better > not install package vlan... :-) It's theoretically deprecated like net-tools... > Good spot about the non-NETLINK errors!! Thanks so much, I completely > missed that! > > So maybe there is just some issue about some vconfig > backward-compatiblity in ifup? > > Have a great weekend, Tom and all the list! Thanks. You too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=swttru0yejk3b_1oziv_mh8oiqe4saaym_ukebn9+h...@mail.gmail.com
