Hello, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:42:15 -0400 (EDT), Geronimo wrote: > > I don't want to offend you, but all that you wrote I already > > found from google and friends. > > ... But I can make some educated guesses. For example, here's an excerpt > from my /var/log/installer/partman file: > ... > The first number after "OUT" is probably the partition number.
As in my partman log there where millions of OUT - lines, I focussed to the lines that look quit similar to fdisk output, like: ========== <snip> =============== Model: ATA INTEL SSDSA2M040 Path: /dev/sdd Sector size: 512 Sectors: 78165360 Sectors/track: 63 Heads: 255 Cylinders: 4865 Partition table: yes Type: msdos Partitions: # id length type fs path name (0,0,0) (0,0,62) -1 0-32255 32256 primary label /dev/sdd-1 (0,1,0) (2611,254,62) 1 32256-21484431359 21484399104 primary ext4 /dev/sdd1 (2612,0,0) (2612,27,38) -1 21484431360-21485322239 890880 pri/log free /dev/sdd-1 (2612,27,39) (2660,173,8) 2 21485322240-21884829695 399507456 primary ext3 /dev/sdd2 (2660,173,9) (4865,122,56) 3 21884829696-40019951615 18135121920 primary ext4 /dev/sdd3 (4865,122,57) (4865,144,62) -1 40019951616-40020664319 712704 pri/log free /dev/sdd-1 ========== <snap> =============== ... and these lines confused me, as wiki said, that biggest value from chs is 1023 - and for me the values in round brakets looked like chs values. As I'm no hero in juggling hex numbers by mind, I wrote a little helper, that dumped the mbr infos. Trying then your advice with "parted -I" I got values similar to the output of my dumper, but not matching the values from partman, so I came to the same conclusion as you - where I had to look at the man pages of parted to find a smaller unit than sectors. So I added little math to my dumping tool and finally the values matched. From manual I already read about the rescue option and as you recommended the same, I gave it a try. ... but I got an error, about missing or wrong label. - Huh? Did not used any label yet. So I added writing capabilities to my dumper and created a mbr, where I thought, should match. Then I wrote it to the drives mbr using dd and rebooted ... Voila - drive is recognized and all works well. Thank you very much for your patience and assistance. kind regards Gero P.S. on writing my dumper and checking all drives against partman log, may be I found a little bug from partman (don't know, whether it has any relevance): According to wiki, head and cylinder are 0-based, whereas sector is 1- based. So I think, a value of (0, 1, 0) as above is invalid and should not occure. I happen to notice 0-based sectors on every drive. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103271453.52148.geronimo...@arcor.de