On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Stephen Powell <zlinux...@wowway.com> wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:06:56 -0400 (EDT), Tom H wrote: >> >> Don't you think that lilo will be left in the repos but not available >> at install time? You could then install lilo post-OS-install or >> through pre-seeding. > > Not without an active upstream maintainer. That's the critical need now.
I meant to say the Lenny repos (although I am curious to see whether it will really disappear from the Squeeze repos once Squeeze is released). The difference between Lenny and Squeeze is: lilo (1:22.8-8.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations: - Czech (Miroslav Kure). Closes: #505912 - Vietnamese (Clytie Siddall). Closes: #513343 - Spanish (Francisco Javier Cuadrado). Closes: #523466 - Italian (Luca Monducci). Closes: #544597 - Basque (Iñaki Larrañaga Murgoitio). Closes: #545514 - Finnish (Esko Arajärvi). Closes: #545511 - Dutch (Vincent Zweije). Closes: #546509 -- Christian Perrier <bubu...@debian.org> Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:54:16 +0200 lilo (1:22.8-8) unstable; urgency=low * Fix some more bashisms. (Closes: #535399) * debian/lilo.postinst: Add -H flag to only install to active MD arrays. (Closes: #507366) -- William Pitcock <neno...@dereferenced.org> Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:54:10 -0500 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimwv73h5sox8inpoobw8te-6x9joqdjt0nul...@mail.gmail.com