On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:51:47 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Malcolmson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Powell wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:01:41 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Malcolmson wrote: >>> Couldn't say why they switched, but I find pages in Epiphany 2.29 in >>> Squeeze look vivid compared with the Gecko version. >> >> I have switched back and forth between epiphany and iceweasel several >> times, on the same computer and monitor, and I have not noticed any >> difference in image quality between iceweasel, which is based on >> gecko (xulrunner-1.9.1) and epiphany-browser, which is based on webkit >> (libwebkit-1.0-2). >> > > Well, I could be hallucinating, but FYI I tested this by comparing the > two Epiphany versions side by side. Version 2.29 was running in a Sid > chroot (schroot -p). The new version looked brighter and a wee bit > clearer. I first noticed this improvement on another computer I'd just > upgraded to Squeeze. However, maybe the difference is something to do > with X.org?
Even if there is a measurable difference in image brightness or sharpness, it's a moot point for me. If I can't download files or reply to e-mails, the Squeeze version is useless to me. I'll check things out again once the Sid version migrates to Squeeze. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1905300792.199120.1271856145572.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
