On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Powell <zlinux...@wowway.com> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:01:41 -0400 (EDT), Andrew Malcolmson wrote: >> Couldn't say why they switched, but I find pages in Epiphany 2.29 in >> Squeeze look vivid compared with the Gecko version. > > I have switched back and forth between epiphany and iceweasel several > times, on the same computer and monitor, and I have not noticed any > difference in image quality between iceweasel, which is based on > gecko (xulrunner-1.9.1) and epiphany-browser, which is based on webkit > (libwebkit-1.0-2). >
Well, I could be hallucinating, but FYI I tested this by comparing the two Epiphany versions side by side. Version 2.29 was running in a Sid chroot (schroot -p). The new version looked brighter and a wee bit clearer. I first noticed this improvement on another computer I'd just upgraded to Squeeze. However, maybe the difference is something to do with X.org? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/h2mae6dd7d31004201651q86f93ceq3b03d972803e6...@mail.gmail.com
