On 2009-07-22 10:02, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In <4a665bf5.2090...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-21 11:51, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In <4a655762.6020...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
Then still I don't see the real gain to separating /usr and
/usr/local into their own partitions.
/usr is managed by the distribution I have installed currently.
/usr/local is managed by me, and moves with me when I change
distributions, like /home.
I just back it and then restore to new system... ;)
I don't have to wait for data to transfer or put additional stress on the
hardware with reads/writes. My /usr/local is < 1GiB, so it doesn't matter
much. /home stays much bigger, though.
We all have our own ways, huh...
I keep /home small ("only" 35MiB), and throw the large files, which
can mostly be shared with others on the box or LAN in an LV
/data/big/share.
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
