On Mon, Jul 20 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:

> On 2009-07-20 21:29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 19 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> On 2009-07-08 20:23, Miles Bader wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>> Hmm, my / is 290MB, though /tmp, /var, /boot, and /usr are all separate
>>>> partitions.
>>> *Why*?  IOW, what benefit do you derive in 2009 (as opposed to 1989,
>>> when disks weren't always large enough to hold it all) from splitting
>>> these out?
>>
>>         Security?
>>
>> /dev/sdb2                            /               ext3    
>> noatime,errors=remount-ro       0       1
>
> Why device names instead of labels or UUIDs?

        *Shrug*. Been a while, and it has been working form me for
 years. Why change?

>> /dev/sda1                            /boot           ext3    
>> noatime,rw,defaults,noauto      0       2
>
> noauto?????


        Who the hell wants the braindead initramfs mucking around with a
 working boot system? It also ensures that I have to be actively
 thinking about modifying my boot process before changes happen.


>> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-usr_lv         /usr            ext3    
>> noatime,ro,defaults             0       2
>
> I understand why this is ro; why then is /boot rw?

        Cause it is never mounted.

>> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-home_lv                /home           ext3    
>> noatime,rw,nosuid,nodev         0       2
>
> What does nodev mean?  (My google fu must be lacking.)  Is "Do not
> interpret character or block special devices on the file system." just
> extra security so that a rogue app doesn't try to create a device file
> anywhere but /dev?

        So no one can create a device or a block char file elsewhere in
 the file system, yes.


>> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-ulocal_lv      /usr/local      ext3    
>> noatime,rw,nosuid,nodev         0       2
>> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-var_lv         /var            ext3    
>> noatime,rw,nosuid               0       2
>> /dev/mapper/anzu_main-spool_lv       /var/spool      ext3    
>> noatime,rw,nosuid,nodev         0       2
>
> Seems to me that this whole exercise is to ensure that /dev is in it's
> own partition.

        Layered security is always better than waiting for the silver
 bullet all secure mechanism. It is all about increasing the work factor
 for Mallory.

        manoj
-- 
All is well that ends well. John Heywood
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to