Hi,
On 5/3/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.03.1217 +0200]:
> So what are the hints wether to use stable the actual name or not?
From my book:
....
Exactly my opinion too, i was more interested in hearing why I would
wan't stable instead of the hardcoded name. I just can't think of any
reason to do that and practically have really use for it (except for
the testing or unstable distribution as I pointed out initially)
Am I solving problems here that wouldn't exist in the first place?
Am I ignorant of why there is a "stable" tree (apart from the
psychological impact that it now indeed is stable)?
martin
--
Martin Marcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mycorners.com
https://www.xing.com/profile/Martin_Marcher
http://www.linkedin.com/in/martinmarcher
http://www.studivz.net/profile.php?ids=9f83ea8c5996b8ec
http://www.amazon.de/gp/registry/wishlist/3KDAGCL2NKOIM/ref=reg_hu-wl_goto-registry/302-4432803-5146435?ie=UTF8&sort=date-added
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
