On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 18:27:39 +0000, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > I vaguely remember that I also had problems with the "?" wildcard when I
> > wanted to create a symlink to partition 1 of my USB harddrive. After
> > some trial and error I found this udev rule:
> >
> > # Lacie 120GB external USB harddrive
> > KERNEL=="sd*1", \
> > ATTRS{product}=="Lacie Mobile Drive", \
> > ATTRS{serial}=="DFE10181B7F3", \
> > SYMLINK+="usb-flo2"
> >
> > The two ATTRS tests make sure that it is the correct device and the
> > KERNEL=="sd*1" specification pins down the partition. That is not really
> > a pretty solution but it has always worked for me. Maybe you can use a
> > similar approach.
>
> Just tried this, no joy:
>
> KERNEL="sd*4", \
> # SUBSYSTEMS=="scsi", \
> ATTRS{model}=="ZIP 100", \
> NAME="%k", \
> SYMLINK+="zip"
>
> I tried it with and without the 'SUBSYSTEMS' line commented.
>
> Any other ideas?
I am not sure how useful this is, but I would try to things:
1) Use "==" instead of "=" for the KERNEL test. "=" for tests has been
depreciated for a while. (It was still supported long after that, but
maybe that has changed now.)
2) Comment out the NAME="%k" assignment. The normal %k device node will
be created by one of the standard udev rules, so there is no need to
do it again. (Maybe that confuses udev for some reason.)
--
Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer
Florian |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
