-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/16/07 02:06, Joe Hart wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:58:10PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
>>> According to Wine HQ, there are no packages for Debian, only Ubuntu
Currently, WineHQ is at v0.9.32 & Unstable is v0.9.30
$ wajig policy wine
wine:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.9.30-1
Version table:
0.9.30-1 0
500 ftp://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main Packages
>>> because the maintainer only runs Ubuntu. The packages are not
>>> compatible with Debian because "Debian changed the package format",
>>> which means you either need to compile the source or use the package on
>>> one of the Debian mirrors, which is usually a bit behind the packages on
>>> Wine HQ.
>>>
>> That is just plain ignorance on the part of the person who made that
>> statement. The package format has not changed. It would be stupid for
>> Ubuntu to do something like that, since all package management tools
>> (apt, dpkg, etc) would need updating to deal with a new format.
>
>
> To quote http://www.winehq.org/site/download-deb
>
> Packages here are designed to function on Ubuntu Edgy (6.10) and Dapper
> (6.06). Packages here used to also work for Debian unstable, however due
> to changes in Debian this no longer works and our Ubuntu maintainer is
> unable to support them. If you can help provide up-to-date Debian
> packages, please contact Scott Ritchie.
Who's Scott Ritchie? The DD is Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>> The problem is more with dependencies than with anything else. As I
>> said, the format is the same. Complaining that an Ubuntu .deb package
>> doesn't work on Debian is like complaining that an Etch .deb doesn't
>> work on Sarge. Over time, as things diverge, it is more likely that
>> packages won't fit across branches. The same is true with Debian and
>> Ubuntu.
>
>> Now, it is really not hard to build package for both Ubuntu and Debian.
>> In fact, it is no harder than building packages for Sid and Sarge.
>> Tools like sbuild, pbuilder and chroot can be used to great advantage
>> here. I hear that there are some Debian developers whose primary/only
>> real platform is Ubuntu and that they package using pbuilder chroots.
>> Generally, this is considered bad practice for a Debian developer since
>> that means that the package received no testing on Debian, but it can be
>> done.
Or if you run Sarge or Testing, grab the unstable deb-src and
compile away...
>> So, to sum it up, the reason that some upstream developers provide
>> Ubuntu but not Debian packages is because they either don't know about
>> tools like pbuilder or are just lazy.
>
> I fully agree. Now we just need to convince Mr. Richie of that. His
> e-mail address is: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I don't think we'll get very far, and I am not the one to do it, since I
> am not experienced enough with properly building Debian packages that I
> can engage in a technical discussion about it.
>
> I misquoted the first time, it doesn't say the package has changed, it
> said Debian changed.
>
> Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF+m6+S9HxQb37XmcRArHEAJ9rNcqaJawqqEjr9J3tsMMXd0ARzgCgnVK6
MBxvPinn4yawrkueMRi2H+o=
=GZBc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
