On Sunday 28 January 2007 18:33, Paul Johnson wrote: ... > > Do you see a difference? > > You could have cancelled and looked into why that is. iceweasel > provides firefox because it *is* firefox. There is no functional > difference between firefox and iceweasel. You're making a mountain > out of a molehill.
Here's the part I don't get. Even though I'm making a living as a programmer, I'm self taught and have missed a lot -- and I don't know C or C++. I've tried to make sense of the listing of what was taken out of Firefox to make Iceweasel, yet I found it hard to follow. Just what was taken out as non-free if it doesn't effect functionality? If it doesn't make a difference, why is it in there? Or have all the non-free things been replaced by free code already? Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
