-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/26/07 10:21, celejar wrote: > In a previous post [0], I claimed that the AMD K6 isn't a 686 - I had > gotten that from the Archlinux website. A followup agreed with me. I > see these sites [1] claim otherwise, and they seem fairly > authoritative. Anyone with more info? > > Celejar > > [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/11/msg00581.html > [1] http://www.faqs.org/faqs/pc-hardware-faq/chiplist/part4/, > http://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=cl&l1=686&l2=AMD
The K6 is *almost* a 686, but the -686 kernel uses the instructions missing from the K6. Use the -486 kernel. (I think there used to be a -586 kernel that was dropped a couple of years ago.) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFui33S9HxQb37XmcRAp8qAKCQ4bSMR/rwSEZDFlT0AzU3qEZhEQCfT2xW RwEYO5t5O+y1FnI4/prP5xU= =0l0l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
