On 09.01.07 09:58, Steve Lamb wrote: > Recently a ton of mail running through SA has been hitting the soft-limit > for spam. I have it set tight, 5.0 for mark and pass. 7.0 for reject at > SMTP. Mail from this list, from Exim's list, mail from an MMORPG I play and > from a motorcycle web site I went to all got blocked. Ok, so maybe someone > got pissed at the MMORPG and Motorcycle site, but Debian and Exim!? Here's > the snippet of score from the latest exim mail to be blocked: > > * 2.8 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist > * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com] > * 3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist > * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com] > > A score of 6.6 because of exim.org being a listed URL? Obviously these > lists are faulty yet the scoring is extremely high? What prompted SA people > to include such drek and throw the scoring completely out the window!?
is exim.org listed in those lists? I'd look at reasons of listing. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
