Hi, On 1/12/07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 09.01.07 09:58, Steve Lamb wrote: > Recently a ton of mail running through SA has been hitting the soft-limit > for spam. I have it set tight, 5.0 for mark and pass. 7.0 for reject at > SMTP. Mail from this list, from Exim's list, mail from an MMORPG I play and > from a motorcycle web site I went to all got blocked. Ok, so maybe someone > got pissed at the MMORPG and Motorcycle site, but Debian and Exim!? Here's > the snippet of score from the latest exim mail to be blocked: > > * 2.8 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist > * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com] > * 3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist > * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com] >
the lists are sometimes wrong - and as such are a risky way of dropping email. Most of them have app. disclaimers - with good reason. Also - afaik its entirely up to you how you rate domains listed in there. No point in blaiming them - they just give you a simple info on if the domain is or isnt listed. Just one fake subscription to this list made by a spamer and _BANG_ - we are all on the list. In your case - id sooner set the softlimit higher and train bayes to know exim and debian are good sites, or drop the offending blacklist. -- Pozdrawiam Łukasz Andrzejak
