Also, any decent Bayesian filter, or indeed any filter will not be thwarted
or totally thrown off by one reply to spam, or (in the long run) a whole
bunch of them. Anyone who disagrees with this doesn't understand the
concept of Bayes' Theorem and how it is practically applied.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raquel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: I WILL ASSIST YOU GET YOUR FUNDS
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:04:02 -0500
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:44:54PM -0800, Bryce wrote:
> Lord Jesus, you're obnoxious. You need to get out more, my
> friend.
>
Well, some people do put significant effort into training spam
filters. Personally, I don't like things confusing my spamassassin
either.
Regards,
-Roberto
I couldn't agree more. I train my filters for myself and for my
clients.
Besides, why is someone criticizing someone's use of the English
language on a multi-national list. Not too smart a fellow.
--
Raquel
============================================================
It is very nearly impossible ... to become an educated person in a
country so distrustful of the independent mind.
--James Baldwin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
