Bryce wrote: > Citing a website for which you yourself are the technical contact is > hardly authoritative. Top-posting is plenty readable for these > shorter threads. Welcome to the 21st Century! > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Top-posting
I guess, you didn't read what you quote. The second paragraph of that whole page reads: "While each online community differs on which styles are appropriate or acceptable, within any community the use of the "wrong" method risks being seen as a major breach of netiquette, and can provoke vehement response from community regulars." Never mind about arguing about top- vs. bottom-posting. Most people on this list much prefer _trimming_ and _bottom-posting_. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Bottom-posting and proper replies without breaking the thread. > Again your post contributes nothing significant. That's a nice summary of all _your_ posts in this thread. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
