On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:02:05PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:57:48PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > FWIW, I don't see the header on this end either.
>
> OK, here's the headers I got from your message...the very first line
> of the headers is rarely inaccurate unless we're dealing with spam.
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 05 21:16:39 2003
> Received: from mail by ursine.ca with spam-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
> id 19O8ec-0001Sy-00
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 21:16:39 -0700
Here are the headers on my end from your message, no bounce address header:
Received: (qmail 3670 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 05:20:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO murphy.debian.org) (146.82.138.6)
by forseti.asgardsrealm.net with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 05:20:26 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 30D8C1F58D; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 00:20:20 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Jamin W. Collins
Remember, root always has a loaded gun. Don't run around with it unless
you absolutely need it. -- Vineet Kumar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
