Johan Kullstam wrote:
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your reason for having the
ambiguity of wether to call it 3.2 or 4.0 is just to keep people from
assigning etch a number?
I think this is quite logical, as there is some structure in those
numbers - 4.0 means a big leap, 3.2 means "smaller " change;
nobody can tell right now how big the step is from sarge to etch, as
it's development has just started
ofcourse, it's just up to the debian development team to decide wether
the changes are big enough to call it 4.0 (anyone know why sarge became
3.1?)
just some thoughts
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
