On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:23:18PM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote: > Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Well, no matter whether the etch release next year or later is going to > > be a big or a little upgrade, etch isn't stable yet, and so if > > it's going to be 4.0 or 3.2 or 3.1415 or whatever, the numbers > > (if any) for what we have now are going to have to be less than that. > > So for the time being, 4.0 is probably inappropriate as a version > > number. > > I don't see why 4 is inappropriate. 4 has been the successor to 3 > for a few thousand years. I don't think that will change in the next > decade.
Nothing wrong with 4 as the number of the etch release. It's just that until we *have* an etch release, the prereleases should have numbers less than the actual relese. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
