On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 06:48:47AM +0800, csj wrote: > Shouldn't he be using the bigger disk for swap? A 1.2 GB drive is likely > to be slower (older=slower).
I think he's got the right idea. The drive may be slower, but it won't be doing anything else, so swap requests won't have to wait for other reads/writes to complete and other reads/writes won't be interrupted by the heads getting dragged off to another section of disk. -- When we reduce our own liberties to stop terrorism, the terrorists have already won. - reverius Innocence is no protection when governments go bad. - Tom Swiss -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
