On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Xeno Campanoli wrote: > Actually, I can't get 2.2.20 by default. I don't see it on stable, and > last time I asked about it I was told to get it off "testing". Kindof > bad since security listings strongly recommend updating production > systems to 2.2.20. > > There is definitely some unfortunate imperfection in maintenance of > stable, IMHO.
It's not perfect, mostly because there are only a very few people working on stable maintenance. (That said, you only *want* a very few people working on it - if there were more, it probably wouldn't be stable any more.) > Nevertheless, I'm still happy to put up with Debian's foibles, as it has > a lot of nice features and I think the whole environment is very > promising. I keep saying I hope to help out more some day, and I'm not > there yet, but I hope to, and more development and QA help is what > Debian really needs. Yes yes yes. The QA team is pretty overloaded, from my point of view - there are a lot more things we could be doing if we only had the time and the organization. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
