Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 07:29:28PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include <hallo.h>
Grant Edwards wrote on Wed Apr 17, 2002 um 12:32:09PM:
> I notice that "woody" installs a 2.2 kernel instead of a 2.4
> Then you should read Release Notes
I did. I didn't find the answer to my question. Can you tell
me which section explains the reasons why Debian still uses a
2.2.20 kernel by default instead of a 2.4 kernel like most
other distros?
and put the bf2.4 CD into the drive.
1) I don't have any Debian CDs.
2) I've already got a 2.4 kernel installed.
3) I'm going to build a custom 2.4 kernel-image package anyway
and the product with that.
My concern is that if Debian hasn't switched to a 2.4 kernel,
there must be a reason. If I start shipping a product with
Debian running a 2.4 kernel, I don't want to find out that
reason from annoyed customers.
--
Grant Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go over to the Developers / Debian-Boot mailing list and look for a
thread entitled "2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??" started
around 4 April 2002, I think. This might answer some of your
questions... dunno.
Cheers,
-Don Spoon-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
