On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:46:16PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > Nevermind that my "change X" or "rework X" is at the exact same level > of the explanation you've given your solution. Difference is, it is > already coded. I've thrown out several ideas. > > Modify the behavior of epoch. > Include a new field to identify separate paths of the same package. > > Notice thats the same as yours: > > Add version number to some package names.
No it's not. Your suggestions either break existing functionality or rely on a non-existent mechanism of unspecified/unsuggested design. My suggestion uses existing functionality and is already in use by many other packages. There's quite a bit of difference there. -- Jamin W. Collins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
