On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:39:40AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > The question at hand is why people believe the only appropriate > behavior is to place the version number into the package name and not > to figure out a way to handle it with the version field or some other > field so that it is transparent to the end-user.
I don't believe anyone in this thread has stated that placing the version number in the package name was the *only appropriate behavior*. I merely provided it as a viable option. If you've got another viable option, I'm sure we'd love to hear it. -- Jamin W. Collins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
