Hadn't noticed any major network usage. Then again, I have a dedicated 100base line running from my desktop to the DC so it's not really an issue. :) Can I expect any real improvements for this type of a setting?
-Alex On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 10:08, Jeff J. wrote: > Not sure if you have noticed how "bandwidth intensive" the regular VNC > release is yet, but its almost nasty, heh.. Check out > http://www.tightvnc.com Its a variant of the same thing. I used to use > VNC, but switched to TightVNC because its much more efficient at managing > bandwidth. Just something you might want to look at. > > Jeff J. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex Malinovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Elizabeth Barham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 11:03 AM > Subject: Re: OT: kvm alternatives? (was: booting with no keyboard or moue) > > > > > --- > This message is certified virus free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
