-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 18 January 2002 7:13 am, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2002 1:04 am, dman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:27:36PM +0000, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > | # This transport does a spam check to look for spam and then
> > | re-injects # the message into exim
> > |
> > | command = spamc | exim -oMr spam_checked -f $sender_address
> > | \$LOCAL_PART use_shell = true
> >
> > Can anyone else comment on the fragility or robustness of this? I
> > think Paul's expansion to use "mailer-daemon" instead of the empty
>
> I found that if $sender_address is null (ie a bounce message) then
> $LOCAL_PART becomes $sender_address and exim fails for lack of recipients.
> The mail goes down a black hole (which is what your want in this
> situation).
Actually I realised this was wrong as soon as I posted it. I have now
changed it to this
command = spamc | exim -oMr spam_checked ${if eq {$sender_address} {} {}
{-f $sender_address}} \$LOCAL_PART
- --
Alan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8SG0y1mf3M5ZDr2kRAmjYAJ9ie5pQEIkLacIrm9SYqXfv3InXPwCfTxK6
A0wLKqxHUgHK3zkDuu2UgFc=
=Ad4w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
