-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 18 January 2002 1:04 am, dman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:27:36PM +0000, Alan Chandler wrote: ... > > | # This transport does a spam check to look for spam and then re-injects > | # the message into exim > | > | command = spamc | exim -oMr spam_checked -f $sender_address > | \$LOCAL_PART use_shell = true > > Can anyone else comment on the fragility or robustness of this? I > think Paul's expansion to use "mailer-daemon" instead of the empty
I found that if $sender_address is null (ie a bounce message) then $LOCAL_PART becomes $sender_address and exim fails for lack of recipients. The mail goes down a black hole (which is what your want in this situation). - -- Alan - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8R8sP1mf3M5ZDr2kRAqt7AJ9SLDN1e9WoVgOZK4DZ1b7yAJSa7wCgwngg 6nFKV4JpAniLXhPq9Fx9Ptk= =Bs/V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
