* Dimitri Maziuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > * Rino Mardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:45:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dimitri Maziuk > > wrote: ... > > > Hmm. We had an NT swerver with about 8 months uptime at work[n - 1]. > > > The only reson it got rebooted was because we bought a rack and had > > > to switch the fscker off to put it in there. So it's not the OS, it's > > > how you use it... > > > > > so you mean you've never used your nt server at all hence the > > unbelievable uptime? don't get me wrong here i just can't believe the > > figures > > We didn't run luser apps on it, except Access (well, DAO, actually). Other > than that it was serving files 24/7. And it was NT _server_, not WS.
More to the point, that post triggerred a pet peeve of mine: winders can be stable, when set up properly. Anyone who says (or implies) otherwise is clueless luser perpetrating FUD. Winders, and the rest of MicroShit crapware is horrible - for many reasons. Uptime is not one of them. Dima -- I'm going to exit now since you don't want me to replace the printcap. If you change your mind later, run -- magicfilter config script