* Rino Mardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:45:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > * Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > > > will trillich wrote: > > > > > > > $ uptime > > > > 12:44am up 365 days, 1:31, 2 users, load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01 > > > > > > > > break out the root beer! > > > > > > Congrats! I think I'll show this to a few Windows users. > > > > Hmm. We had an NT swerver with about 8 months uptime at work[n - 1]. > > The only reson it got rebooted was because we bought a rack and had > > to switch the fscker off to put it in there. So it's not the OS, it's > > how you use it... > > > so you mean you've never used your nt server at all hence the > unbelievable uptime? don't get me wrong here i just can't believe the > figures
We didn't run luser apps on it, except Access (well, DAO, actually). Other than that it was serving files 24/7. And it was NT _server_, not WS. Dima -- In cyberspace no one can hear you laugh -- Bill Bumgarner in RISKS 21.65
