I meant as a PDC :) File sharing, sure, it works with my 2k box now, but I heard that it uses legacy auth stuff.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Sam Varghese wrote: > Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:37:51 +1000 > From: Sam Varghese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Newbieish question > Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:38:17 -0700 > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:43:30AM +0100, Neil Durant wrote: > > Brian Ballsun-Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > >This is my dilemma: to run samba-tng, I have to upgrade to "unstable." My > > >mandate explictly states that downtime is *BAD*, very, very, very, > > >bad. How risky is running unstable? What shouldn't I do? Should I upgrade > > >to 2.4.6? (I'm running a home box as a testbed for this, so I'll be warned > > >slightly in advance, but...) > > > > Why won't your basic Samba from stable do what you need? It works for > > me, with Win2k clients! > > Works for me too with Win2K clients. My server runs > potato with a 2.2.17 kernel. > > Sam >
