On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 03:43:30AM +0100, Neil Durant wrote: > Brian Ballsun-Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >This is my dilemma: to run samba-tng, I have to upgrade to "unstable." My > >mandate explictly states that downtime is *BAD*, very, very, very, > >bad. How risky is running unstable? What shouldn't I do? Should I upgrade > >to 2.4.6? (I'm running a home box as a testbed for this, so I'll be warned > >slightly in advance, but...) > > Why won't your basic Samba from stable do what you need? It works for > me, with Win2k clients!
Works for me too with Win2K clients. My server runs potato with a 2.2.17 kernel. Sam -- (Sam Varghese) http://www.gnubies.com
