>>>>> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You said: Jeremy> I use Outlook because I find it to be better than any piece of Jeremy> shit MUA that I can run on Linux. I happen to find Linux Jeremy> rather lacking when it comes to the desktop arena and when I Jeremy> actually have to do work instead of playing, I need something Jeremy> that works. Windows NT (and Outlook, when it comes to e-mail) Jeremy> happen to fit that bill quite well. and in a later message: Jeremy> Allow me to expand a little bit. I don't have the time to Jeremy> sift through every mail client listed on Jeremy> SourceForge/FreshMeat/etc. to find one I like. I've used Jeremy> Outlook for years, I like it, it works for me(tm). If you Jeremy> don't like it, don't use it. I promise you won't hurt my Jeremy> feelings. You see, I hope, the difference between "any piece of shit MUA I can run on Linux" and "I don't have the time to ... find one I like". The former implies none exist. The latter merely implies that the marginal benefit you feel you could gain by switching from outlook to a linux client is smaller than the search costs. Many of us find that linux allows us to do work. Some (including me) feel it is a better environment to do work than any Microsoft Product. Not that, of course, your MUA really has anything to do with your ability to make intellegent comments, but that first message was a bit more of a flame than was warranted. -Eric
