Subject: Re: where to do iptables setup?
Date: Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:41:57AM -0500
In reply to:will trillich
Quoting will trillich([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 07:37:50AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Re: where to do iptables setup?
> > Date: Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:28:51PM +0530
> >
> > In reply to:Raghavendra Bhat
> >
> > Quoting Raghavendra Bhat([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > [Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:08:37PM -0500] will :
> > >
> > > > apt-get install ipmasq
> > > >
> > > > unless i've missed something?
> > >
> > > Vineet should get a dependency error now. You
> > > have missed 'iptables'.
> > >
> > > Is my thought process patently wrong ? 'ipmasq' is
> > > a package which depends on the basic package
> > > 'iptables | ipchains'.
> > >
> >
> > No, your right, Will has his mind on Newbie things, that all.
>
> my reputation exceeds me, i can see that. :)
>
> on my potato setup it looks for ipchains and if it can't find
> it, then it falls back to ipfwadm. i presume that the woody
> incarnation looks for iptables and then falls back to ipchains,
> right? so whichever firewall rule-munger you've got installed,
> ipmasq will use the most advanced one.
>
> based on what i know.
>
Will
The question was 'where to do iptables setup'. Iptables is the next
step, beyond ipchains. (iptbles != ipchains).
My potato setup 'used' to look for ipchains until I upgraded the
kernel to 2.4.x and then went to the improved iptables.
I am glad that I am not the only one who reads one thing and writes
about something else. On another list yesterday, I answered an
ipchains question with an iptables answer. :-(
Offtopic: On that sig you have to remove the ^M. I am too lazy I
guess. I use the dos2linux or unix2dos programs. Your newbie tip,
for me, is way too much for this senior citizen to remember.
Cheers buddy.... :-)
Wayne
--
My software never has bugs. It just develops random features.
_______________________________________________________
