On Sat, 5 May 2001, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I'm no expert on printers, but I don't think resolution is a very good
> indication of print quality. I think it's entirely possible that a
> 600x600 laser will have better quality than a 1200x1200 inkjet.
>
I agree - inkjet quality depends very much on the media you use with
it. The rule is this: good output needs expensive paper.
Lasers give good output on plain photocopier paper.
I have an HP Laserjet 6L, which was the cheapest of HPs lasers. I works
fine using ghostscipt, and gives excellent results. I don't print very
much, but so far it's only cost the price of a paper to run - over four
years.
In hindsight I should have gone the 6MP postscript one - but it was
about twice the price at the time.
cheers
dc
--------------------------------------------------------
Today people in droves hurry up past Heumoz to Villars
on the road to the ski hills, so they can rush down them
as fast as possible, so they can hurry up again in order
to rush down again. In a way this is funny,...
Francis A Schaeffer
David Purton
http://www.chariot.net.au/~dcpurton/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
