Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 06:02:51AM +0000, Joost van der Lugt wrote: > > > Mmm, actually, I had the same problem needed to run gimp 1.2 and could > > not get it to compile on glibc2.1. > > really? i just compiled the unstable gimp 1.2 packages on my potato > box and didn't have any problems. though i also compiled some of the > gnome libraries from woody as well. i am still running libc6 2.1.3-18 > > i did have to make a few tweaks to the gimp package to make it build, > mostly disabling the perl packages i think. since those depend on perl > 5.6 which i don't even dare attempt. (upgrading perl is worse then > libc)
Aah, well it did in fact complain about, I believe, gtk not being available in a high enough version, so I just upgraded everything:) Guess I did not have too. -- Cheers, Joost van der Lugt