better yet, why use a log file analyzer at all? they can't truly measure web surfer behaviour anyways, only web server behaviour.
staf wagemakers wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:46:15PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote: > > Very reluctantly I am unsubscribing from the list. I have sincerely > > appreciated all the info and help from you guys, but the Debian server > > I set up at work is now wiped. The reason I had to set it up was for > > the Webtrends Enterprise Reporting Server, which is technically for Red > > Hat. I was having little litte weird problems here and there and > > since Webtrends won't support any system other than Red Hat 6.x or > > above, I wiped the drive and installed Red Hat 6.1 since we had a CD > > of it at work. Now I remember why I hate Red Hat and have gained more > > respect for Debian that I already had. Dammit. I think the only > > think I like about Red Hat is that the default vi is vim. > > Why should you use "webtrends" if there're Free alternatives? > > log analyzers like webalizer are easier to use and so much faster than > webtrends... > > -- > Staf Wagemakers > > email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > homepage : http://staf.digibel.org > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
