On Jul 05 2000, Corey Popelier wrote:
> Umm, yes and no. Kernel 2.2.15-3 is patched against those
> vulnerabilities. 2.2.15-2 and previous are not.
Humm... Sorry... I wasn't refering to kernels from Debian
(and, to be honest, I don't use them), so I really don't know
(I only use stock kernels from Linus/Alan with a select set of
patches applied by hand like André Hedrick's and Reiser FS).
But thank you for your information. I guess that I'll have a
closer look to the ones distributed by Debian.
> From what I've read, 2.2.16 was kinda rushed, and 2.2.17 (once out
> of Pre) will be considered the better way to go.
Indeed. Alan Cox even talks about 2.2.17pre having better
stability than 2.2.16.
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/nectar/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
