Umm, yes and no. Kernel 2.2.15-3 is patched against those vulnerabilities. 2.2.15-2 and previous are not.
>From what I've read, 2.2.16 was kinda rushed, and 2.2.17 (once out of Pre) will be considered the better way to go. Cheers, Corey Popelier http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Rogerio Brito wrote: > On Jul 04 2000, ktb wrote: > > I'm guessing the source is on your disk but you can get kernels from -- > > http://www.kernel.org/ > > Don't use that site. Use ftp://ftp.xx.kernel.org/ instead > (where xx is your country code) to let the community mirror it > faster. > > In the same way, don't use ftp.debian.org. Use some mirror > like ftp.xx.debian.org. > > > if I remember right there are some security issues with 2.2.14 so > > you should get a more recent kernel than that. I think 2.2.16 is > > fixed. > > Actually, 2.2.15 also has the vulnerability. So 2.2.16 is > indeed recommended. > > > []s, Roger... > > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/ > Nectar homepage: http://www.linux.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/nectar/ > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
