> > > On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Brian White wrote: > > > > Assuming that forking a "kamakazi" child is not an acceptable > > > solution, is there some way of capturing the image of the process from > > > the kernal? > > > > Hmmm... That's interesting. Assuming there is no library/system call > > to force a core dump, I could fork a child and then make the child access > > mem at 0xFFFFFFFF to cause a segfault and dump core. Would that work? > > > There remains the issue of if one cannot fork a child process ... this > seems more likely than not being able do dump.
What about the `files' in /proc/<pid>? Aren't any of those core images? Eric -- E.L. Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | tel. office +31 40 2472189 Eindhoven Univ. of Technology | tel. lab. +31 40 2475032 Lab. for Catalysis and Inorg. Chem. (TAK) | tel. fax +31 40 2455054 -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
